The main goal of the Biotronics Project is to provide future thinkers and tinkers alike on how to make a living thinking machine. My Arduino Scratchbook/iHackrobot() is a makerspace, a community of diverse minds who collaborate and exchange ideas, skills, and inspirations with a common vision; to foster the spirit and virtue of Humankindness. To the newbies, welcome to the lab where we always say Let there be Lights!
The Biotronics Project was conceptualized by Joey Lawsin in 1988 with two basic objectives in mind: to design and create intuitive machines (IM) that look alive or with life and with consciousness. These IMs are collectively named Biotronics. They are sometimes called the Silver Species. This new group of synthetic living organisms can see, smell, taste, hear, feel, think, breed, fly, swim, create, and are aware of themselves and their surroundings. They die too. New smart robotic systems such as Neurotronics, Homotronics, Wise Sensors, and Inverse Matrix were invented and developed by Lawsin too to meet all the demands of his information materialization, sensoric perceptions and imaginations, and associative consciousness.
Sensoric Awareness
The First Biotronics: B.I.N.G.
Biotronics V2: K.I.M.
The project was first designed using the Lawsin Linkage, a double cantilever truss system with connecting elements (links) that form triangular frames. It is a structural mechanism that was developed to simulate the walking cadence of biotronics animals. The Links fulfill the following requirements:
1. It must carry out a walking cadence fluidly like an actual living animal's gait.
2. It can conquer any type of terrain obstacles from carpet floors to seabeds.
3. It can move in different directions with various range of actuated motion or R.O.A.M.
4. Its structure elements must be guided by nature's mathematics like geometry.
5. It can be integrated with the Arduino platform for micro-consciousness programming.
Then, the project was put together by combining the various stages of the process:
Phase 1: The Lawsin Linkage
Phase 2: The Led Indicator
Phase 3: The MicroServo
Phase 4: The Ultrasonic Sensor
Phase 5: The Piezo Speaker
Phase 6: The Stepper Motor
Phase 7: The First Biotronics
Finally, the proof of concept was delivered into actual physical reality using the Arduino microcontroller as the "brain"(neurotronics) and lego's gears and beams as the "body" (homotronics).
The Proof of Concept:
Stage 1: The Lawsin Linkage Structure:
Stage 2: The Homotronics Side:
Stage 3: The Neurotronics Side :
Stage 4: The Mathematics:
Stage 5: ZiZo, The Inverse Queue :
An Intuitive Aneural Network
Stage 6: The Prototype:
Stage 7: The First Conscious Robot:
Animated by Structural Algorithm
Animated by Computer Program
Self-Animated by Inscirption by Design
In his other book, Originemology, Lawsin argued that Consciousness is not a matter of being aware of one's self and one's environment, the two basic ingredients of consciousness as defined in Webster dictionary. He refuted these definitions based on his thought experiment known as the "The caveman in the Box Troika" and laboratory experiment known as "The
Bowlingual Experiment" with two dogs named Zero; an Alaskan malamute
and Peanut; a chihuahua as specimens.
In these experiments, he concluded that:
(1) An object is alive if it simply consumes energy. The energy is produced chemically without any personal interactions by the object. The object is simply animated by its own construction design through the power of its energy. However, the self-animation doesn't mean it is aware and conscious.
(2) An object is aware when it uses its sensors and alive when it is powered by energy. However, it is not conscious; and,
(3) An object is conscious when it acquires and uses information for itself.
To be conscious one must learn to match or pair what he senses - sees, smells hears, taste thinks - with a tag, a label, a
definition, a description, or a name. This one to one correspondence is known as Associative Consciousness (Lawsin, 1988).
Can Biotronics or AI become humans? Joey Lawsin, who invented the AI Paradox from his work Originemology, investigated the limitations of artificial intelligence in replicating human equivalency. The AI dilemma highlights the distinction between "choice-driven sentients" (AI capable of programmed consciousness and reasoning) and "chance-driven sapiens" (humans who discover through unpredictable moments). From his work on the origin of acquisitions of information, Lawsin uncovered that there are only two ways to acquire information: by choice or by chance. AI can process information through choice but lacks the ability to experience true discovery, which is a hallmark of human self-realization.
Thus, the paradox underscores that while AI can achieve a form of programmed sentience, it cannot fully replicate human equivalency due to its inability to engage in unplanned, chance-driven learning. Humans, as he observed, thrived not only on logic but on unpredictable moments of discovery—the thrill of serendipity, the joy of intuition. AI, no matter how advanced, could only simulate discovery through pre-coded algorithms, always bound by the chains of programmed logic which he called algorithms (external) totally separate from his work on inherent natural embedded inscriptions (internal).
From this paradox arose the Codexation Dilemma, an even deeper philosophical quandary. Lawsin proposed that "No human can think of something without associating his thought with something physical". Words, numbers, symbols—all are codexes, or constructs which humanity used to make sense of a reality they could not fully grasp. Yet, these constructs are often circumstantial and subjective, shaped by the Majority Bias.
His radical concepts coalesce into a greater ambition: the One Theory of Everything: "Everything exists because other things cause it to exist, otherwise, it exists and does not exist, meaning, it is not there, but it is there (the Genie Paradox). According to Lawsin, Consciousness is an emergent which originate from his personal dictum: "If I can match x with y, then I am conscious".
The final result of all these shows that life is more mechanical, chemical, instructional than biological. Thus, indeed, Life is more of chemistry and not biology.
Autognorics / ELFS / Gnos
Public Domain Notice: Copyright (c) 2000. All rights reserved. This article is part of a book entitled Biotronics: The Silver Species.
Copies are welcome to be shared or distributed publicly as long proper citations are observed. Please cite as follows: The Biotronics Project, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.
"The Last Human on Earth will no longer be Human." ~ Joey Lawsin